Oct
26
When the Internet started in the 80’s, globalization was unheard of and those working in international organizations were not “connected” across frontiers and seas. Open questions – fewer at that time – were solved by asking nearby in the same office, floor, building or restaurant. Twenty years later, technology has made everything faster and everyone closer; to keep a business among the leaders, collaboration is a must, real time, across distance and frontiers.
Read more »
Written by Cécile Demailly
Enterprise 2.0, Instant Messaging Enterprise 2.0, Mobility, WOW world of work
Oct
18
Trois mouvements se sont récemment précipités:
- de l’agriculture à l’industrie et au savoir,
- du vertical au transversal et au matriciel, et
- de l’information à la communication et au partage.
Read more »
Written by Martin de Waziers
Uncategorized
Oct
14
Vous connaissez le 360° feed-back ? Il s’agit d’un processus d’évaluation des compétences piloté par l’entreprise à partir d’un référentiel de compétences défini par l’entreprise. Cela peut servir pour détecter les hauts-potentiels ou pour évaluer les résultats sur le mode entretien annuel d’évaluation.
Rypple est un service proposant un système de feed-back auto-géré. Voici quelques textes extraits de leur site pour comprendre le système :
Read more »
Written by Olivier Zara
Enterprise 2.0, Management, Personal Branding
Oct
08
sTDL, i.e. those extensions after the “dot”, that are sponsored e.g. by a brand like .ibm or .love or .hate, or .brand, etc. will soon be available.
The implications for branding are quite interesting. A “brand” will much less need to register in multiple countries or with multiple extensions to be “protected”. The .brand will be useable for all its activities in a fully controlled way. In other words a brand can decide to have only .brand as its root extension.
Read more »
Written by Dominique Turcq
Uncategorized
Sep
29
As I mentioned in an earlier blog on the Future Features of Social Media, there is a lot of difficulties for community tools designers to “invent” new usages (although they can invent new features) and there is a lot of difficulties for the users to find out which usages they will need tomorrow. This conundrum is particularly true with social media within corporations. It is harder for a corporation to put itself on a wait and see basis, to see how employees will use a tool, than for the Internet community at large (where the evolutions of, say, a Twitter is always fascinating, interesting and risk free for the observers).
Read more »
Written by Dominique Turcq
Uncategorized